It’s been two long years of lockdown and it’s fair to say all those Uber Eats have been piling up, especially when the government has paraded and closed gyms.
Yes, the government’s official solution to a pandemic where the biggest risk factor for death was cited as “overweight” was to lock people in their homes and ask them to “Netflix and relaxation” with an endless supply of pizza. Just under half of the western world reported extra bulging or too much and now that people are allowed outside there are definitely more yoga pants and long sweaters than usual.
But do not worry. The World Economic Forum has gathered in Davos to help solve this crisis of overstuffed humans indulging in a scarce century of abundant food.
Humans have access to too much food. It’s not a pandemic problem, according to the WEF, it’s a climate change problem. How dare the people in the West, who looked after their country and cultivated a thriving agricultural industry, reap the benefits of democracy, capitalism and a robust education system. It’s just not fair to countries that continue to descend into ethnic civil wars, tribal violence, religious practices that keep women at home, or whose people succumb to the promises of socialist warlords who continue to seize power and rule through corruption supported by hundreds of billions in global aid programs.
Instead of exporting successful ideologies and systems of government, the WEF demanded that the West become more socialist and implement an artificial food shortage created by a reinvented social credit system. They can’t go straight to the Chinese system, where citizens are punished for not liking Xi Jinping enough, so the plan is to start by punishing Western citizens for ogling a steak.
Moral judgment and physical limitation are about to be imposed on our dietary decisions – which by extension will collapse the Australian farming community which will have no choice but to sell to foreign investors or leave their properties behind. invaded by insects. Not only are the Greens and Teals planning to overtax, overregulate and reclaim farmland (for environmental reasons, of course) – adding a carbon cost will stifle demand for fresh produce and wipe out the last Australian farmers . Is this really what we want?
It goes far beyond the annoyance of vegans and vegetarians protesting in aisle 9 or the nudge of someone chowing down foie gras in a fancy restaurant.
We’re supposed to ditch our fresh foods and vegetables, meats and treats and replace them with mud and lab-grown beetles. If the WEF and the crazies on the UN climate change panels have their way, modern humans will eat worse than the peasants of the Dark Ages. At least the rats still had meat on them.
Calculating the Carbon Cost (yes, that’s how it’s described by companies already working in partnership with the WEF to certify the calculation), is set to appear on menus around the world as a calorie count. With increasing digital surveillance demanded by our government – whose representatives are present in Davos – how long before the cost of carbon affects our digital identity? How long before it becomes like an unofficial credit score?
The Chinese social credit system did not start with threats and restrictions. It was sold to the public (and tested) as a reward system where citizens could compete in virtue.
Early users in China used the Social Credit System app to engage in “good activities” to purchase or access “privileges”. This makes sense in China where the communist system actively denies its citizens access to the trappings of society enjoyed by party members. In the West, we work hard, earn money, and then buy what we want as a reward. The government has no say in our choices or our subsequent successes. At first, this virtue system was popular in China – but the Chinese people missed the sinister point. They shouldn’t have to “virtue signal” to gain access to society, they should demand that the government stop oppressing them.
Unfortunately, children in the West are not much smarter. The idea of a Woke Virtue Signaling contest with government rewards sounds like a great idea for people too lazy to work. Finishing a week of honest, hard work to learn a trade? Certainly not. Much easier to order a salad wrap with extra weevils and get a big green “tick” from Big Brother.
The West must learn from China’s mistake.
It only took a few months for the social credit reward system to turn into a tool of dictatorial punishment. Buy the wrong thing, criticize the government, get out of the state-approved narrative, and suddenly you can not buy food, your children can not go to school, and you can not use the transit system to escape.
The Chinese people are trapped in the same idea being promoted as an innocent climate virtue this week in Davos – technology that Western billionaires in Silicon Valley (who censor our public forum) helped devise.
Ultimately, it’s about control.
Don’t eat this. Do not say that. Don’t think that.
The result is a population that has no choice but to consume what the big companies at the top of the food chain are selling us, whether we like it or not – just like the products “offered” by vaccine manufacturers were purchased by the government and forced upon the community through denials of rights. When the WEF talks about the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the Great Reset, and building back better, it’s describing the end of the free market, merit, and competition.
Klaus Schwab is not joking when he says: “We are building the future!
Take a really good look at the people behind the climate change narrative. They are the ones who hop on private jets, lounge in five-star hotels and live on private islands in mansions larger than some cities. They eat, drink, smoke and swallow whatever they want while plotting to lower your quality of life in order to “save the planet”.
Something is wrong with this image.
What happens, we must ask, to those who don’t stick to the cost-of-carbon regime? Will it be a disappointed little nod, or are we going to see a war between the Health at All Sizes movement and the World Economic Forum? Australia must reject this cost of carbon before it takes over our economy.
Do you have something to add ? Join the discussion and comment below.